Special thanks to Securitize and Backed Finance (xStocks) for their review.
Tokenizing real-world stocks compresses two-day settlement cycles into seconds, enables programmable assets, and unlocks 24/7 global trading. Yet the sector remains small—roughly $370 million compared to $120 trillion in global equities.
This blog explores:
Key design considerations for security tokens;
Best practices and standards on BSC/EVM chains, with protocol examples;
Opportunities for improvement in compliance, infrastructure, and liquidity.
We’ll break down what’s live today, the regulatory roadblocks, and how tokenized stocks could grow 10× by 2026.
1. Mechanism of Tokenized Stocks
Stock token designs span a spectrum: on one end, compliant custodial wrappers offer only price exposure with limited DeFi utility; on the other, fully composable on-chain synthetics maximize DeFi access but confer no real shareholder rights and face stricter derivatives regulation. As mentioned in various discussions:
Type
Tokenization Models
Compliance
Ownership
Composability (DeFi-friendly?)
Typical Examples / Platforms
Direct(native)
Issuer/Transfer Agent
Fully Compliant - for both issuer and transfer agents
Represents direct ownership of the securities and claim against the issuer
Moderate – limited DeFi composability. However, can leverage wrapped tokens to make it composable.
Represents claims against the custodian, i.e. securities entitlement
No live product yet. The actual securities are offchain under third-party custody, transfer is not peer-to-peer, but intermediated instead; wall gardened system with little composability
Compliant - A third-party issuer creates a new product (e.g. deposit receipt, single-stock ETF, security swap, etc.) that tracks the value of underlying securities
Represents ownership of the new/separate securities
Moderate – may stay walled-off from open DeFi until exemptions mature.
Market Potential: If just 0.002% of global equities are tokenized by 2026, the market could reach ~$3B. While still nascent, tokenized equities are showing early signs of traction—and the room for growth is massive.
3.The Tokenized-Stock Trilemma
Token issuers must juggle three goals that pull in different directions:
Pillar
What “full” means
Why it matters
What breaks when you maximize it
1. Compliance
(KYC · securities registration · on-chain transfer controls)
Every jurisdictional rule is met; only whitelisted wallets can mint, redeem, or receive tokens.
Fully regulated and enables CEX listings or institutional inflows.
Tight KYC gates or transfer hooks restrict how—and where—tokens can move, limiting DeFi utility.
2. Ownership
(redemption, dividends, voting rights)
Token legally represents the underlying share; holders can redeem, receive dividends, and vote.
Delivers the same economic & governance rights as legacy shares.
Legal wrappers and corporate-action pipelines add cost and slow settlement; KYC is usually mandatory, curbing composability.
3. Composability
(permissionless liquidity, DeFi integrations)
Token flows freely across DEXs, lending pools, structured-yield protocols, bridges, and DAOs.
Unlocks 24/7 trading, collateral use, and on-chain financial engineering.
Wide transferability clashes with strict KYC; regulators balk, so most projects strip out voting/dividends or rely on synthetics.
Core insight: a design can excel at any two pillars, but the third will be compromised:
Compliance + Ownership → tokens sit in a closed, KYC-walled environment with little DeFi reach
Compliance + Composability → wrappers trade freely but only give price exposure (no voting).
Ownership + Composability → would deliver “real shares in DeFi” but currently clashes with most securities laws.
4. Compliance Implementation
Bringing real-world equities on-chain is impossible without robust identity controls. Today every live product relies on one of two whitelisting mechanisms:
Whitelisting Model
How It Works
Strengths
Trade-offs
Smart-Contract Registry(on-chain)
Each time someone calls transfer() or mintTo(), the token contract pings an Identity Registry.
If either wallet lacks a valid credential, the transaction reverts.
On EVM chains this pattern is formalised in ERC-3643.
Entire permission set lives on-chain;
no central key can override it;
portable across dApps.
Adds gas / compute;
Devs must deploy and maintain the registry;
UX friction (wallets must obtain credentials).
Custodial Control(off-chain gate)
A single regulated entity controls the mint/burn keys.
Only KYC’d customers can deposit fiat (or shares) and receive tokens from the custodian’s treasury wallet.
Once minted, tokens may—or may not—circulate freely.
Simpler compliance checklist;
No extra on-chain logic;
Fast to iterate.
Creates a choke-point; users depend on the custodian’s uptime and legal domicile;
Smart-Contract Registry in Action
ERC-3643 (initially known as T-REX) illustrates the on-chain model:
Every transfer runs isVerified(). Securitize uses the same logic, even if its contracts don’t formally signal ERC-3643 compliance. When users transfer tokens, the preTransferCheck will be executed to see if the receiver is on the registry.
xStocks show how a single entity can satisfy regulators and still issue tokens that are usable in DeFi once minted. The “Trust Stack” Behind CRCLx (Circle Tracker Certificate):
Layer
Role
Detail
Real-Asset Layer
Asset Reserve
Alpaca Securities LLC holds real Circle shares 1 : 1.
Chainlink oracles publish live proof-of-reserve.
Legal-Wrapping Layer
Issuer Entity
Backed Assets (JE) Ltd. – a Jersey SPV – legally owns the shares and issues tracker certificates.
Tokenization Layer
On-Chain Financial Product
Backed Finance AG mints CRCLx (SPL) on Solana - the token is the tracker certificate. Token creator ID: S7vYFFWH6B…VwsJuRaS (view on Solscan).
Ownership reality: CRCLx is a tracker certificate—holders get price exposure, and have the primary claim to the collateral value. They do not have voting rights, but dividends and splits are managed via rebasing.
Phase
Who Must KYC?
Where Tokens Can Go
Primary (Mint / Redeem)
Only pre-approved institutions or professional investors.
Tokens minted/burned inside Backed custody.
Secondary (DEX Trading)
Freely transferable tokens. Anyone can LP or trade once CRCLx hits the pool.
Easily used across DeFi.
Result: xStocks reconciles the regulator’s need for strict KYC at the capital-formation edge with DeFi’s demand for permissionless liquidity after issuance.
5. Potential Challenges
Regulatory FragmentationSecurities rules, KYC standards, and custody requirements differ sharply across the U.S., EU, Asia, and offshore hubs—forcing issuers to geo-fence users or launch multiple wrappers.
Ownership vs. Compliance Trade-offGranting full shareholder rights (dividends, voting) triggers stricter securities treatment; most projects settle for price-tracker certificates, limiting investor appeal.
Corporate-Action PlumbingStock splits, mergers, and dividend events must update token supply and metadata in real time; today this is still a manual—or at best semi-automated—process prone to error.
Proof-of-Reserve & Custody RiskTokens are only as trustworthy as the oracle showing that real shares remain in custody; stale data or a custodian failure undermines the entire instrument.
UX Friction Around KYCOn-chain registry checks (ERC-3643 style) add gas cost and onboarding steps, while off-chain custodial gates break composability—both hurt adoption.
Together these hurdles explain why only 0.0003 % of global equities are on-chain today despite clear demand for 24/7, programmable trading. But, with new solutions arising, there is rapid growth potential for tokenized stocks.